Skip to main content

Full text of "Glenunga Dispatch Issue #10 Deleted Edition"

See other formats


, 


Sa 


# “tee y 


= 
~~ 
> 
Y 
ss) 
a 
8) 
, 

= 


= 


lent Tribune 


—— 
=e 
€ 
=e 
sf 
oe" 
a= 


Peo Le 





Issue #10 


The Glenunga Dispatch 


26/05/21 





WON LAA CELA 


26 May,-2021 
2 a 


04 Film & Media 
Insight on the Johnny 
Depp Trial 

By Alfonso Lafosse 

06 Opinion 

In Complete Intolerance 
of Margaret Court 

By Charlie Stamatogiannis 
09 Op-Ed 

Vale Olympia Dukakis 
By Luke Reichstein 

10 Politics 

Welfare Doesn't Make 
People Lazy 

By Alex Brown 


Page 2 


(2 Technology 
A Call for Free Software 
By Anton Ivanov 


[4 Film & Media 
Mainstream Cinema Has 
Something to Learn from 
Television When It Comes 
To LGBT+ Representation 
By Akshara Radhakrishnan 
18 Film & Media 

Marvel's Blockbuster 
serum 

By Chetan Changalasetty 








19 Film & Media 
Minari - A Family's 
Assimilation 

By Zac Briffa 


21 Politics 
A Fiery Sky Over Israel 
By Amin Slee 


22 Film & Media 

A Miracle Drug Trial Gone 
Wrong? 

By Max Lock 


24. Politics 

Threat Level COVID 
By Vidhi Vira 

25 Poetry 


Issue #10 


The Glenunga Dispatch 


26/05/21 





Editor-in-Chief’s Note 


Dear Staff, Students, and Community Members, 
We're back! 


The Glenunga Dispatch has commenced its publishing season. It has been a long time coming, so we 
thank you for your patience and support... ’m going to stop right there actually. I’m not going to lie to 
you, I know very well that in high school all of us are very busy and very much appreciate how reading 
the school newspaper is not one of our priorities. | am not oblivious to this fact. What I will say however 
is that, does this mean journalism should stop? Does this mean that as individuals who are committed 
to speaking our minds and writing our hearts out, we should stop because we have no one to read what 


we say? [he answer is simply no. 


If journalists didn't report, the principle of free speech and holding government and power accountable 
would not exist. If journalists didn't report, anybody who missed the baseball game wouldn't know the 
score. Information is crucial to our society because information gives people - ordinary people - the 


power to do great things and know great things. It leads to inspiration, learning and experience. 


What we do here at the Dispatch is write about what should be known, and of course we can't cover 
everything, that is why we want you to join us. We are starting a new initiative called the People’s 
Section, where we ask the school community what they think we should write about and report, and one 
or more of our amazing writing enthusiasts will take on the job! Glenunga is an international minded 
school with amazing opportunities, the Dispatch is just one of them, and we want you to be a part of 
what we do! This year, we have more writers, more editors and more focus on our goal of amplifying 
student voice and letting students customize their say. It is a mission that is always hard to accomplish 


but we are more excited than ever to try. 


As I write this first editorial back, I know that many people will not be reading this. But on the off 
chance that you are, I hope that you enjoy reading the rest of our tribune and that it inspires you to read 


further about something, learn something, or even want to get involved. 
As always, thank you and I hope that you will put your belief in the power of the press! 


Sincerely Yours, 
Amir H. Alikhani 
Editor-in-Chief 


PS 

For anyone who remembers my last editorial, I took a leave of absence from the paper which at the time 
I thought was permanent, however a series of events has led to my return and personally cannot wait to 
publish all of the amazing articles, photographs, illustrations and contributions that the Dispatch team 
has to offer. It’s good to be back; stay tuned. 


Page 3 


Issue #10 


The Glenunga Dispatch 


26/05/21 


In May 2016, Amber Heard, a 30-year- 
old entertainer, showed up at a Los 
Angeles court looking for a restraining 
her husband, the 
Hollywood star Johnny Depp. As she left 


order against 
the building, she ended up encompassed 
by photographers, journalists and film 
crews. On her cheek was what gave 
off an impression of being a mark. The 
court was likewise demonstrated photos 


of what resembled facial bruising. 


She guaranteed Depp had “violently” 
assaulted her and in a wrath had 
tossed a cell phone at her face with 
“extreme force”. There were additionally 
charges of different occurrences of 
abusive behaviour at home. She said 
she had persevered through “excessive 
emotional, verbal and physical abuse” 
and “angry, hostile, humiliating and 
threatening assaults”. Depp denied the 
maltreatment. The restraining order was 
granted and since, the marriage has been 


over. 


After four years the couple were back 
in court, however this time in London. 
Yet, this was not Amber Heard’s case 
- she had not decided to be here. ‘This 
was a libel action Depp had brought 
against a British paper, Ihe Sun. At the 


core of the case was his attestation that 


Insight on 
the Johnny 
Depp Irial 


By Alfonso Lafosse 


Page 4 


the claims of actual maltreatment were 
an “elaborate hoax”. Depp utilised a 
standout amongst other known lawyers 
in the nation to attempt to demonstrate 


the cases were false. 


The Royal Courts of Justice are gigantic, 
gothic and profoundly grave. It’s a 
position of stone curves and quieted 
tones. Furthermore, in July it was 
practically empty. I state practically, 
because on the grounds that there were a 
couple of individuals - a small bunch of 
journalists rushing through security, and 
furthermore waiting in the foyers and 
entries, a dispersing of Depp fans. At 
around 10:00 every day his fans would 
assemble at the entryway to Court 13. 
As Depp strolled past they would offer 
messages of help and, towards the finish 
of the case, he was seen giving them 
each, the heartfelt embrace of a hug. 
A little serenade of 


by 


“Johnny, Johnny’ 


could be claimed to 
be heard as he strolled 


into court. 


It was 
but difficult to fail 
this 


anything 


to remember 
was a defamation 


fight among Depp 


and News Group Newspapers, the 
distributors of The Sun, in light of the fact 
that nobody from the paper was called 
to the witness stand. Dan Wootton, the 
columnist whose article had said there 
was “overwhelming evidence” that the 
star was a “wife beater” was not even on 
the rundown of 79 names referred to in 


the preliminary’s reports. 


The case started with an email trade 
about the dangers of addiction among 
Depp and Sir Elton John and afterward 
proceeded with references to a baffling 
cast of characters. James Franco, Marilyn 
Manson, Elon Musk, Winona Ryder, 
Kate Moss and Vanessa Paradis were all 
visitor stars in a story that took a private 
universe of the Hollywood A-rundown 
and blew it apart. 








Issue #10 The Glenunga Dispatch 


26/05/21 





Amber Heard was 22 when she met Johnny Depp on the 
set of the film The Rum Diary in 2009. He was in a long- 
term relationship with vocalist and actress Vanessa Paradis. 
Heard’s wife at the time was the artist Tasya Van Ree. After 
two years, Heard was living with Depp in a penthouse in 
midtown LA, Depp having split from Paradis, his wife of 
14 years. Heard and Depp wedded in February 2015, and a 
little more than a year later it was finished. From that point 
forward, Amber Heard has become a vocal campaigner on 
the issue of domestic and sexual abuse. The UN Human 
Rights Campaign named her asa Human Rights Champion 
for her work advancing women’s rights. She turned into an Ambassador for Women’s Rights for 
the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and she has given talks 
and written in the Washington Post and New York ‘Times about her 
















experience of abusive behavior at home. 


Later on it was announced that Amber Heard admitted to have 
attacked and abused Johnny Depp several times. Often pelting him tih 
pots, vases and pans as it was revealed in an audio confession. Amber 
Heard, an Ambassador for Women’s Rights and a domestic abuse 
advocate said the following the morning after she had attacked Depp, 
attempting to downplay her outburst. 


‘T’m sorry that I didn't, uh, uh, hit you across the face in a proper slap, but 


I was hitting you, it was not punching you. Babe, youre not punched.” 


“I don't know what the motion of my actual hand was, 
but youre fine, I did not hurt you, I did not punch you, 
I was hitting you.” 


‘I can't promise you I won't get physical again. God I 


f™king sometimes get so mad I lose it.’ 


‘You poke an animal enough, it is eventually, it doesn't 


matter how friendly it is, it’s not cool.’ 


The whole cycle, which included a practically ruthless 
public assessment of a couple's private life, erected from 
an unmistakably a profoundly grieved relationship, 
however the case relied upon demonstrating who 
had done what to whom. Furthermore, eventually, 
the adjudicator concluded to depict Depp as a “wife 
beater”.Causing Depp to be removed from the cast 
of the new “Fantastic Beasts & Where to Find Them” 
movie, which then caused disturbance among many 
fans of the star. Due to this many Depp fans are asking 


to remove Amber Heard from the cast of “Aquaman.” 





Page 5 


Issue #10 


The Glenunga Dispatch 


26/05/21 





in Complete 


intolerance of 
Margaret Court 





] n my experience, one of the most absurd 
yet frequent comments made in political 
discussions when it comes to matters of left 
versus right is ‘so much for the tolerant 
left’. This is nonsensical for a few reasons; 
for one, I have never heard anyone on the 
left describe their position as ‘tolerant’. In 
fact, I like to think we make it abundantly 
clear that we want absolutely nothing to do 
with bigotry of any kind (and if you don't 
believe me, I suggest you go speak to the 
mythical Supreme Leader of Antifa). The 
second reason is less petty and actually 
serves as to construct an argument rather 
than just take cheap shots at conservatives. 
If youre at all familiar with Karl Popper's 
Paradox of Tolerance, you'll know where 


this is going... 


Page 6 





By Charlie Stamatogiannis 


Before I continue, Id like to quickly 
clarify that I do not believe that support 
for Margaret Court, whether that be as 
an athlete or a controversial pastor, is 
synonymous with being on the right. That 
said, I say with confidence that most people 
defending her right to be promoted to a 
Companion of the 
Order 
likely 


way. 


of Australia 
lean that 


The 


of ‘Tolerance 


Paradox 

states 
that in order to 
maintain a_ tolerant 
society, we must not 
tolerate intolerance. 
This pretty 


simple, to me at least- 


sounds 


stamp out the bigots 


(including Ms Court) and hurrah, we have 
achieved tolerance! But then the issue 
arises of how we determine what should 
and shouldn't be tolerated, and we have 
ourselves a divided public opinion. Do we 


choose to tolerate religious freedoms or 


LGBT+ identities? From my perspective, 





Issue #10 


The Glenunga Dispatch 


26/05/21 


we shouldnt even have to debate this, 
as it’s obvious that Court disseminates 
homophobia and transphobia under the 
guise of exercising her religious freedoms. 
Based on this, we can determine that both 
religious freedoms and LGBT+ identities 
should be tolerated, but only so long as 
neither infringe upon the other. Some 
more progressive folks who hold religious 
views would even argue that Court wrongly 
weaponizes and misinterprets the Bible, 
and that her intolerance isn’t inherently 
linked to her religious identity, but instead 
allows her to confirm her bias on perceived 
(although unfounded) moral principle. 
I cant say I really have an opinion on 
this take, but I think it’s definitely worth 
questioning whether we should really view 
this as a conflict between ideas, or more 


accurately identities, worth tolerating. 


Aside from Australian society potentially 
devolving further into intolerance, | don't 
quite understand honouring, let alone 
promoting Court to such an esteemed order, 
on the basis of her athletic achievements. 
Whether you side with her comments or 
not, I think we can all agree it’s pretty poor 
of a public figure to direct hateful rhetoric 
towards other competitors in your field. In 
1990, Court made criticisms of tennis great 
Martina Navratilova, stating that although 
she is a ‘great player’, Court would prefer 
‘someone at the top who young players 


can look up to. She then confirmed 


her 
by saying 


very sad for children 


homophobic _ bias 


Ge) 


that ‘it’s 


to be exposed to 
homosexuality’. To me, 
this screams “bad sport’, 
and even if we were 
concerned with athletic 
merit alone, surely this is 
a rather compromising 


memory of Court. 





And now, allow me to pre- 
emptively defend against what 
I predict will be the most 
popular argument in favour 
of Court among high school 
students; (insert un-nuanced 
take on cancel culture and 
how it supposedly destroys 
everything good). PIl save my 
critique of the ‘cancel cancel 
culture’ attitude for another 
time, for now I'll direct your 
attention to Court in 2017, writing a 
letter to The West Australian calling for a 
boycott of Qantas after the airline publicly 
supported marriage equality. In other 
words, Court participated in cancel culture 
according to its most basic definition, so 
why on Earth should she be exempt from 
it? 


and thus 


Quite 


disproving the varying ways in which 


frankly, examining 
Court’s comments could be put aside in 
order to celebrate her sporting achievements 
feels wrong. Even if am making a point to 
decry her, playing devil’s advocate even for a 
second is so pointless when her words have 
inflicted so much damage on a community 
I love so dearly. If this weren't written for 
a school-based publication, I assure you I 
would have abandoned all eloquence and 
simply said in words far-from-graceful and 
profanities unfavourable to the ears, that 
Court is an abhorrent human (although 
I’m sure this format does far more for my 


argument). 


Honouring Court once was questionable 
enough, honouring her a second time is 
quite honestly disgusting. Not only does it 
condone her deplorable comments, but it 
also sends a message of ‘this is the best we've 
got’ in terms of Australians, and indicates 
a degree of complacency that people of 
different marginalised groups simply do not 


have the privilege to so ignorantly possess. 





In protest against Court’s promotion, Clara 


Tuck Meng Soo, a transgender medical 
practitioner awarded the Medal of the 
Order of Australia in 2016, gave notice to 
the office of the Governor-General that she 
would be returning her medal. Similarly, 
journalist Kerry O’Brien, who was due to 
receive an honour on January 26th 2021, 
refused to accept his award due to the 
‘deeply insensitive and divisive decision’ to 
honour Court a second time. Celebrating 
Court is an insult to the Australian 
LGBT+ community, especially those of 
which have been honoured alongside her 
by the Council for the Order of Australia. 
Intolerance is a slippery slope, and with 
Trump's presidency having already majorly 
shifted the overton window, we can't afford 
to devolve even further. I say we start the 
year right by trying to correct this mistake; 


let’s not tolerate Margaret Court. 


Page 7 


Issue #10 The Glenunga Dispatch 26/05/21 
ee 


: ones that \Qa sh bee XPeriening Gender aliys Doria: 
romosetval ty is @ lhe Youn Qn25 to as Thats ee heed iQ, 
LUST of “the FLEstL, what | | 
CS wny they Want Marriage 
USE ib’s CLUE SAH SE ying 


hoes” 


me yk 


ave 
aes 


=. \qemnis 


iv S 


£ 
or ok 


Elneric 9 whole 
/2 PloE in our Naton ond 
we the nations of fhe 
WW WOLD today tr got 
JE + tha eae : 


ova 1 4 8 
Nov akin’ hol 
Lenn 3 che \S 


—S LEG PAR S 


2 


t*& 


Artwork by James Hillier (@Nordacious on Instagram) 





Issue #10 


The Glenunga Dispatch 


26/05/21 





Vale Olympia Dukakis 


An icon of stage, film and television, 
Olympia Dukakis was born in Lowell, 
Massachusetts on June 20, 1931. She spent 
her early years devoted to the theatre, 
quickly being noticed by critics and in 
1963 she was awarded an Obie Award 
for Distinguished Performance as Widow 
Leocadia Begbick in Brecht’s Man Equals 
Man. From there Hollywood called with 
roles in Look Who’ Talking, Mr. Holland's 
Opus and Steel Magnolias, in which she was 
Clairee Boucher, digging for gossip with 
the one-liner: “If you don't have anything 
nice to say about anybody, come and sit by 
me!” In 1987 Dukakis reached the peak 
of her fame, starring alongside Cher, in 
her Academy Award and Golden Globe 
winning performance as no-nonsense 


matriarch, Rose Castorini, in Moonstruck. 


But it was in 1993 that Dukakis risked her 
entire career in her role as Anna Madrigal 
in Tales of the City. Armistead Maupin’s 
novel was adapted for television with 
Dukakis as Anna, the marijuana-growing 


matriarch and owner of the apartment 





Words by Luke Reichstein 


building at 28 Barbary Lane. Born a man 
and transitioned, the name Anna Madrigal 
is an anagram for A Man and a Girl. 
Dukakis brought warmth and wittiness 
to Anna Madrigal that made her one of 
the most beloved characters in the cast, 
reflecting the way Maupin depicted her 
in his book. She played Anna Madrigal in 





the follow-up series that aired in 1998 and 
2001. 


Her final adventure as Anna Madrigal 
occurred in 2019 in the Netflix-produced 
update of Tales of the City that brought 
closure to the storyline. Her casting in this 


final chapter brought some controversy, as a 





cisgender actress playing a trans character 
was not in keeping with the demands of 
the queer community. At the time executive 


Alan Poul rebuffed 


suggestions noting “the very bold decision 


producer these 


made by Olympia to play a trans character 
in the 1990s” and that “she has clearly 
earned the right to finish out the role.” 


As one of the first actresses to play a trans 
Dukakis 


visibility and humanity to a community 


character, Olympia brought 


that had been neglected for far too long. 
She passed on May 1, 2021 aged 89. 


Page 9 





Welfare doesn’t make 
people lazy: Debunking 
the ‘Dole Bludger’ 


By Alex Brown 








Page 10 


Issue #10 


The Glenunga Dispatch 


26/05/21 


The Evidence 

A group of MIT and Harvard researchers 
conducted a Meta Study of 7 cash transfer 
programs in 6 developing countries, and 
found that these programs had no effect 
on work participation. In fact, this study 
also references another study, which found 
a particular grant program in Uganda in- 
creased work hours by 61%. However, these 
programs were directed towards some of 
the poorest people in the world, and they 
are not necessarily comparable to an Aus- 
tralian welfare program. A more accurate 
example would be the Alaskan Permanent 
Fund: a basic income program that gives 
money to all Alaskan residents uncondi- 
tionally, paid for by taxes on the oil indus- 
try. Ihe only change in work behaviour was 
a slight increase in the share of part-time 
work, however, there was no decrease in the 
share of people employed. Another study 
on Medicaid in the United States found 
that it had a statistically insignificant ef- 
fect on labour participation. Overwhelm- 
ingly the evidence from studies conducted 
by economists is that the stereotype that 
welfare recipients are lazy and refuse to do 
work is, without a shadow of a doubt, com- 


pletely false. 


Personal Failure or Systemic Issue? 

According to a study by the World Eco- 
nomic Forum, the more people attribute 
poverty to personal failure, the less gener- 
ous that the welfare systems of countries 
will be. In Australia, being poor is a larger 
indicator of experiencing discrimination as 
opposed to race, sex, sexuality and other, 
similar factors Many Australians think of 
poverty as a personal failure. A sentiment 
that is as inaccurate as it is harmful. There 
are many different reasons for people being 
poor in Australia, a common one being a 
lack of opportunity due to being born into 
a financially disadvantaged family. Aus- 
tralia is one of the least socially mobile 
countries in the developed world, meaning 
that if you are born in a poor family, you 
are very likely to stay poor your entire life. 
More often than not, people in poverty are 


in poverty by no fault of their own, but even 


if they were, would this justify Australia’s 
attitudes towards poverty? For the sake of 
the argument, let’s say all poor people are 
poor because they made bad decisions. 
Should they be left to suffer in poverty be- 
cause they made a mistake? What led them 
to making that mistake? How can we stop 
people from making that same mistake? 
Blaming poverty on the impoverished 
achieves nothing. It ignores the suffering 
of struggling Australians. Poverty can be 
eradicated, the first step is acknowledging 


that poor people aren't to blame. 


The Choice Between Work and Welfare 

Looking at the quantifiable effects of wel- 
fare on employment does disguise the per- 
sonal effects of welfare. The only two factors 
that affect the decision between welfare 
and work is how accessible each is. In plac- 
es with low wages, high structural unem- 
ployment and systemic discrimination it 
is much harder to choose work. Similarly, 
in places with poor and restrictive welfare 
programs and social stigma around welfare 
recipients, it is much harder to choose wel- 
fare. But what is so wrong with choosing 
welfare? Is dropping out of the workforce 
always a bad thing? Is productivity the sole 
value of humans? Is being able to afford the 
essential items in order to live while unem- 
ployed bad? Being able to stay unemployed 
longer allows workers to find jobs more 
suitable for them. This diminishes Monop- 
sony power, the ability of employers to co- 
erce workers into worse contracts because 
of high competition for work. Furthermore, 
working less can be socially advantageous. 
Retirement is a way people drop out of the 
workforce and it is seen as positive. Work- 
ing less because welfare is covering some of 
the bills isn't laziness. In some cases, prior 
to welfare, there are people who work ridic- 
ulous hours every week to make ends meet. 
Is it bad to go from 60 hours a week wait- 
ing tables to 40? What about going back 
to school, is working less in order to study, 


lazy? 


Is Laziness a Symptom of Welfare? 

Welfare ultimately only reduces work when 
it is higher than wages. But why is this an 
issue with welfare? Why should welfare 
be eradicated because multi-billion dollar 
companies like to pay their employees as 
little as possible? Isn't a principle of capi- 
talism that businesses must pay their em- 
ployees enough that they’re willing to work 
there. Companies are failing to pay their 


workers enough to live on, so maybe it’s 


them who should be under scrutiny instead. 





But what about the Children? 

‘The benefits of welfare extend past helping 
the working class pay the bills. ‘The social 
benefit of eradicating poverty is tremen- 
dous. 774,000 children in Australia are liv- 
ing below the poverty line, to call these peo- 
ple poor because of their own faults and not 
because of factors far outside their control 
would be unambiguously false. Childhood 
poverty is linked to poorer performance in 
schools, poorer socioeconomic outcomes, 
and higher rates of criminality and men- 
tal illness. Ihe argument that welfare is bad 
because it encourages people to be lazy is 
such a shallow argument. It ignores the re- 
ality of poverty and spitefully decides that 
the wellbeing of 774,000 children is less 


important than punishing ‘free loaders’. 


Ultimately this argument unravels to a 
simple question- do you want to help those 
who are disadvantaged and create a social 
safety net, or are you stubbornly opposed, 
and instead believe in a mythical group of 


‘lazy’ welfare recipients? 


Page 11 


Issue #10 


The Glenunga Dispatch 


26/05/21 





very person in this world who has 
E used a computer has been using 
non-free software, software designed to 
take away the freedoms of its users. Have 
you used Microsoft Word, Microsoft Ex- 
cel? Have you used Google Search? What 
about Microsoft Windows, Apple’s macOS, 
a commercial antivirus, Adobe Photoshop, 
Google Chrome, drivers for NVIDIA 
graphics cards, a computer with a closed- 
source BIOS/UEFI (literally every com- 
puter), a computer with an Intel processor? 
These are only a few examples of non-free 
software. Have you used any of the above 


software? Most certainly you have. 


Let’s step back a bit. What constitutes free 
or non-free software? In this article I will 
not be referring to ‘free’ as in money, like 
‘free food’, but free as in freedom, like ‘free 


speech’. 


You would have, most certainly, have heard 
about how different programs, devices, and 
online services track you, collect personal 
data, and in other ways limit or flout your 
freedoms. These are all examples of non- 
free software. Such software may hide itself 
behind a paywall, send diagnostic data to 


its creators (and often third parties), stop 


+7 


i 


working at specified points in time, require 
you to make an account, require your personal 
information (name, email address, phone 
number, credit card details, etc.), or other 
things along those lines. Such software 
might impose restrictions on your use of it 
and may restrict you from removing certain 
features, modifying it, etc. Windows, for 
example, doesn't let you uninstall Internet 


Explorer. 


In contrast, free software is software that 
allows you to modify it, disable and enable 
what you wish, and use it as you want to, 
without taking away any of your freedoms, 
such as your privacy or your right to do 
whatever you want with the software. Great 
examples are the GNU/Linux operating 
system, GNOME Maps, and LibreOffice. 


In my experience, free and open-source 
software works much better than non-free 
software. [his is because free software has 
no monster-sized blocks of code designed 
to track you and/or make sure that you have 
paid for the said software. And the nature 
of open-source software is such that the 
source code of the program is available for 
anyone to examine and point out problems 


and bugs, which are then usually fixed by 


- 


panes 
,¢€ 4 re> 


. Ss 
> segme for = 
x i ann i ut cole 


%. 
7 - 
































the software developers. This is why I find 
free and open-source software superior to 
the proprietary counterparts, which are 


usually slow and buggy. 


The GNU project, backed by the Free Soft- 
ware Foundation, was started in response 
to the fact that closed-source proprietary 
non-free software was prevalent (and still 
is) in the world. This started off with the 
creation of the GNU operating system 
(an operating system is the system that 
runs your computer and what all of your 
apps run on), which was incomplete until 
it was combined with the Linux kernel (a 
kernel is the core of an operating system). 
This resulted with GNU/Linux, a free and 
open-source operating system that is gain- 
ing more and more popularity among the 
tech community. It is widely used in servers 
(all those computers which make the Web 
work run on Linux) due to the fact that it 
has much less bugs and works much bet- 
ter than, let’s say, Windows Server. 90% of 
cloud infrastructure in the world, including 
supercomputers, runs on Linux. And be- 
cause it is free for anyone to use, modify, 
and redistribute, most smartphones, routers, 
and servers run on Linux or forks of Linux. 


Such is the power of free software. 


i Fs 
- . i 


¥ i. c 





File 


Edit Selection view Go Run Terminal Help ‘main.go - Go_tips - Visual Studi 
tips ~ io Code 


im) EXPLORER 


> OPEN EDITORS 


2) ’ GO_TIPS 


main.go 


maingo xX 


main.go >... 


¥ 


You may be wondering how you can avoid 


non-free software and switch to the better, : 
aveDataFunc 
GetDataFunc f 


free software alternatives. Here are a few 


Pye ed ae ee en eT 





alternatives that I recommend: 


I find LibreOffice to be a great replacement for Microsoft Office. Typing 
on LibreOffice Writer is much faster than on Microsoft Word. Also, 


LibreOffice Writer is compatible with Word documents, even if it does 


DuckDuckGo is a free search engine, which you can use as a 
replacement for Google Search. It still provides good search 
results, and has many of Google Search’s features (such as word 
definitions). Although it comes with advertisements enabled sometimes mess up the formatting slightly. LibreOffice Calc is a great 
by default, you can disable these in DuckDuckGo’s settings. alternative to Microsoft Excel. Just like Writer, it is compatible with 
Also, unlike Google Search, it comes with a dark theme which Excel spreadsheets. A unique thing about LibreOffice is LibreOffice 
you can also toggle at any time (which can help your eyes). Draw. Essentially you can add text boxes, shapes, symbols, and arrange 
them however you like. You could create drawings, fancy documents, 


sketches, and more. I highly recommend giving LibreOffice a try, even 
' Fed Up With Companies 
Selling Your Data? 


if you don't want to switch. 


|} LibreOffice’ ea) =) 


[crooked-photo] (imported)-81.0 (RGB color 8-bit gamma integer, GIMP built-in sRGB, 1 layer) 1703x1136 - GIMP 
pr Colors Tools Filters Windows Help 


DuckDuckGo 





GIMP is a brilliant alternative to Adobe Photoshop. Both 
are hard to master, but come with a wide range of different 
tools which allow you to edit images however you want 
to. Unlike it’s Adobe counterpart, GIMP is free, and is 
actually created by the GNU project (GIMP stands for 
GNU Image Manipulation Program). If you are tired of 
the unusability of Microsoft Paint this might also be an 


option if you're willing to learn a lot about using GIMP. 


If you want to remove the proprietary 
blobs of Windows or macOS, you might 
want to give Linux a shot. Linux is a great 
operating system. Although it doesn’t come 
as one complete operating system (I wish it 
was), it comes in a variety of distributions. 
These distributions contain the operating 
system and all the software that you would 
need to manage your system. Different 
distributions are suited for different needs. 
For most people who simply want a working 
system, Ubuntu is a great replacement 
for Windows or macOS, especially with 
a few tweaks. Personally I use Ubuntu, 
with a few of my own customisations, as 
one of my systems (because it has a lot 
of software compatibility). his is what 
I would recommend for most people. If 


you think you are a Linux master, though, 


I would recommend a system which truly 
respects your freedoms and runs much 
more smoothly, like Alpine Linux. For 
beginners, setting up Alpine would be an 
overkill though, as you would need to setup 
everything from the graphical interface to 


audio to automated disk management. 


If you are really willing to stretch yourself 
in the technologies field, trying Ubuntu 
might be worth it. It isn't for everyone 
though, as it is rather difficult for someone 
who has no idea on the underlying concepts 
of how operating systems work to setup 


and manage Ubuntu. 








It is really important that people take back 
computing in their hands. As companies 
strive to generate as much revenue as 
possible by selling consumers’ data to third 
parties, keeping software closed-source, and 
mass-producing software without checking 
for code quality, it is only up to the user’s to 


choose between free and non-free software. 


Page 13 


Issue #10 


The Glenunga Dispatch 


26/05/21 





epresentation in media, especially in 

TV and film, has come a long way 
in recent years, with more and more films 
with LGBT+ storylines coming out, and 
more LGBT characters are appearing in 
TV shows and movies alike. However, it’s 
no secret that the mainstream iterations of 
both mediums still have a long way to go 
in terms of proper, accurate and uplifting 


representation. 


But where big feature films fall short, 
network and streaming platform TV 
shows manage to get much more right 
with their representation and inclusion 
of LGBT+ characters- a claim supported 
by many within the LGBT+ community 
who strongly feel that they are often better 


represented in shows than in films. 


So what makes TV better at LGBT+ 
For 


starters, we need to consider what “good 


representation and __ inclusivity? 
representation” is. While this is definitely 
not a simple question, at its core, good 


LGBT+ 


that are identifiable as a member of the 


representation is characters 
LGBT+ community, yet are not defined 
by their sexual orientation or gender 
identity. LGBT+ characters should also 
be significant to the plot, so they do not 
exist only to add diversity, or for comedic 
purposes. LGBT+ characters should matter 
and have depth to them. 


Page 14 


Mainstream Cinema 
Has Something to 


Learn from Television 
When it Comes to 








LGBT+ Representation 


By Akshara Radhakrishnan 





Where Hollywood films fail at this, 


mainstream television has shone in 
its ability to produce shows which are 
celebrated for their LGBT+ representation. 
LGBT+ characters in big feature films are 
not given the time to be explored and grow, 
as they are on television, and are often 
relied on as comic relief, and used for what 
is called “token representation’ — where 
LGBT+ characters are represented in easy 
to miss lines or scenes, but are still used to 
market the film. An example was the much 
hyped “exclusively gay moment” in Disney’s 
remake of Beauty and the Beast, which 
ended up being a blink-and-you'll-miss-it 
shot where two men danced together in 


the final scene of the movie. The problem 


with this being increasingly prevalent in 
mainstream film is that audiences miss 
out on seeing significant, well-rounded 
characters representing a group of people 
who have already been so underrepresented 


and mistreated in mainstream media. 


This is where TV comes in; mainstream 
TV shows give members of the LGBT+ 
community the opportunity to see their 
lives reflected in popular media, without 
losing wider their appeal. This comes with 
the fact that I'V shows do a better job of 
representing different aspects of the life of 
LGBT+ people with depth and realism, 
something a feature film isn't able to do with 


their brief moments of “representation”. The 


small, barely significant LGBT+ characters 
in mainstream film can often lack greater 
significance because they dont display 
the journey these characters go through 
in discovering their identity, or even 
navigating everyday life for that matter T'V 
shows are ideal for providing insight into 
this, allowing audiences to appreciate, and 
most importantly, understand and relate 
to the highs and lows which come with 
belonging to the LGBT+ community. 
Shows like Brooklyn Nine-Nine feature not 
only one, but two lead LGBT+ characters, 
who audiences see grow and struggle in 
their positions and relationships. We not 
only get to see detective Rosa Diaz come 
out to her friends as bisexual, but also her 
struggles afterwards as her parents don't 
accept her sexual identity. In shows such 
as Bojack Horseman, we get to see the 
character Todd go through internal conflict 
as he tries to figure out and come to terms 
with his own asexuality, even before he is 
able to come out to his friends. Seeing the 
journey characters go through before they 
are accepted by themselves and others is 
what makes LGBT+ representation in TV 
so much more impactful, as members of the 
LGBT+ community see more of their own 


lives reflected in storylines. 


As well as this, LGBT+ characters in TV 
shows, despite not being the main character, 
feel equally reaspected and appreciated, 
because they exist not only for their 


representation of the LGBI+ community, 








ab eas 


” 


but are also engaging characters in their 
own right. Characters like Sophie Bursett 
from Orange is the New Black portray the 
life of a transgender woman while still 
being creating an amazingly engaging 
and dimensional character, and shows 
such as Netflix’s Sex Education have been 
praised for being able to portray multiple 
characters who each go through individual, 
distinctly different, well thought out 
journeys of understanding and discovering 
their identities. Characters in the show are 


each given sufficient screen-time required 


Fos 
“TS 


yA, 
y\ 
WY i ) 
Ny 
‘ 
AiR » 
RK. ‘ 








<y iv ar 
ask, 
3° mo % SN 


to not only develop the LGBT+ side of 
their characters’ identities, but also their 
own strong personalities separate struggles 
and relationships with other characters, 
both platonic and romantic, all whilst not 
allowing any of them to fall into a one-size- 
fits-all character trope that has plagued 
queer film and T'V in the past and present. 
This well roundedness and attention to 
other aspects of their characters makes 
anything they go through relating to their 
sexual orientation or gender identity much 


more real. Now, in comparing this to the 








Issue #10 


The Glenunga Dispatch 


26/05/21 





LGBT+ characters in many well-known 


films, it is extremely evident that they feel 
less significant and unrelatable because 
their only real identity is their sexual 
orientation, or, because we know nothing 
about their journey as an LGBT+ character, 
so it can be harder to identify with them. 


A key film which comes to mind when 
discussing this unfortunately prevalent issue, 
is Love, Simon, in which the protagonist 
is a teenaged boy named Simon whose 
story navigating coming out as gay in high 
school is portrayed in the film. After being 
marketed as “possibly the most radically 
queer film of all time”, the film manages to 
alienate the only uncloseted gay character 
other than Simon, a person of colour named 
Ethan, and reduces his possibly more 
nuanced and complex depiction of being a 


gay male who is proudly out, to him simply 


Page 16 


being too effeminate and flamboyant, 
therefore also subscribing to the outdated 
dismissal of such staples of gay culture as 
‘too gay’. This therefore means the film 
ends up using his experiences with bullying 
and generally not being accepted as a joke, 
as, to quote Simon, he is “making it too easy 
for them [the bullies]” by being himself. 
This ultimately results in Simon, a middle- 
class, white, and conventionally masculine 
character being used to essentially disavow 
this depiction of being gay to serve the 
idea of homonormativity, minimising and 
‘whitewashing’ the complex realities of 
queer people by presenting the experiences 


of Simon as those of all gay or queer people. 


Television as a platform has proven its 
versatility, as increasingly more shows 
broadly represent the varied lives of 


LGBT+ characters authentically, as they 





are created just like any other character, 
with personalities and struggles relating to 
and outside of their LGBT+ identity. This 
sort of positive representation of LGBT+ 
people is so incredibly important, as people 
who may not have much contact with 
members of the community in real life, 
will take what they see on T'V and in films 
as factual. ‘This creates the opportunity 
for film and TV to help remove some of 
the unfamiliarity and uncertainty people 
may have, and as positive representation 
leads to greater acceptance in real life, it is 
imperative that film catches up to TV in 
terms of striving for this, and that they both 
continue in the right direction towards 
accepting, supporting and celebrating the 
LGBT+ community. 


Issue #10 The Glenunga Dispatch 26/05/21 


SO]Nite 
RAINBOW 


As part of this year’s Pride Month celebrations, the Arts Captains and Glenunga’s Queer Club 
bring you Sonic Rainbow, an upcoming music event this term. Expect all the usual, outstanding 
talent of Infinite Echo, but with the recurring themes of queer pride and love throughout all 
the performances. This event, while all about celebrating Glenunga’s LGBT+ community, is not 
exclusive to queer-identifying students, and allies are encouraged to come along to have fun 
and show their support. Profits from food, drink and ticket sales will go towards Black Rainbow, 
an organisation committed to investing in the futures of Indigenous LGBT+ youth. 


Keen to perform? An audition form will be sent out soon, so keep an eye on your emails. 


Page 17 





Issue #10 


The Glenunga Dispatch 


4 
er 
AY 


26/05/21 


flarve I's Bloch bus tel 


4 

’ ; 
4 

a % 


a => - 
j ' ’ 


In the past decade, the Marvel Cinematic 
Universe (MCU) has redefined the movie 
franchise scene in the film industry. ‘The 
franchise’s 23 films have grossed more 
than $17 billion USD ($19 billion AUD) 
- more than any movie franchise in history. 
With each dedicated film averaging an 
impressive 84% on Rotten Tomatoes and 8 
of the 25 highest grossing films of all time 
being part of the MCU. Avengers: Endgame 
(2019), is now the highest grossing movie 
of all time grossing a whopping $2.8 billion 
USD ($3.6 billion AUD). Achieving such 
a successful franchise is far more difficult 
than it sounds. The success of one movie 
usually does not indicate that the sequel or 
the franchise will be successful as well. “It’s 
quite a risk taking process”, John Favreau, 
director of Iron Man 1 & 2 said. So how 


does Marvel make it look so easy? 


The Corporate Story 

The narrative of the Marvel Cinematic 
Universe is heavily based on the Marvel 
Comics Group - founded in 1939 by Martin 
Goodman, an American publisher of 
magazines and paperback books. In order 
to capitalize on the growing popularity 
of comics - especially superhero based 
comics Goodmancreated Timely Comics, 
which later became Atlas Comics, and later 
became the known Marvel Comics Group. 
The company had its ups and downs until 
the 60s when Goodman-hired writers Stan 
Lee and Jack Kirby, who created iconic 
superheroes still popular till this date, 
such as Iron Man, Spiderman, ‘Thor, ‘The X 


Men, Black Panther and more. For multiple 


Page 18 





4 y 
decades Marvel Comics and it’s rival DC 
Comics ushered through to the comic book 
industry. Throughout the 90s however 
the company’s management took a turn 
by turning into a publicly held company 
in 1991. When the comic industry had a 
slump in sales, causing them to eventually 
sell the company to the Walt Disney 
Company. 


Rise to Fame 

At the beginning of the 21st century 
Marvel’s profits were mainly derived from 
toys, video games, and other merchandise 
featuring popular characters from the 
comics. With companies such as Fox, 
Universal and Warner Brothers having 
success by translating popular comics to 
the big screen. Marvel’s ambitious goal was 
to release a set of films featuring a wide 
range of characters all part connected in 
a single shared world. ‘The journey started 
with Marvel’s Phase 1 releasing Iron Man 
(2008), The Incredible Hulk (2008), Iron Man 
2 (2010), Thor (2011), Captain America: 
The First Avenger (2011) and Marvel’s The 
Avengers, a film featuring Iron Man, ‘Thor, 
Captain America and The Hulk. With the 
film grossing over $1.5 Billion USD ($1.94 
Billion AUD) worldwide, the MCU was 
born - soon to become one of the most 


lucrative franchises in history. 


Marvel continued on to produce films 
which included sequels to the old films, and 
introduction to new characters such as The 
Guardians of the Galaxy, and Ant-Man and 


a wave of television programs which were 


) ly ry emi e ane * ih. ty 


a 
not part of the MCU cannon. Black Panther 
(2018) was a big step for Marvel as it was 
the first film to win an Academy Award: 
receiving an Oscar for original score, 
costume design and production design. 
Changing the norm of the MCU, from 
being “kid’s movies” to critically acclaimed 


movies. 


The Future 
With a 

COVID-19, and the death of Chadwick 
Boseman (T’Challa/Black Panther) Marvel 


has recovered from the unfortunate damage 


significant setback during 


and is moving on to create more projects. 
With its new partnership with Disney+, an 
online streaming site, Marvel is releasing 
TV shows featuring characters which 
have been introduced in past films. A wide 
range of movies are also being released to 
expand the narrative of the films. It is only 
exciting to see what the future has in store 


for Marvel. 


Regarding the secret of such success Kevin 
Fiege- head of Marvel Studios offered a 
quite simple explanation in an interview 
with Variety: “I’ve always believed in 
expanding the definition of what a Marvel 
Studios movie could be. We try to keep 
audiences coming back in greater numbers 
by doing the unexpected and not simply 
following a pattern or a mold or a formula”. 
Therefore, the secret seems to be finding a 
good mix of innovation in film, retaining 
enough continuity to make all characters 


part of a family. 





Minari - 


A Family’s 
Assimilation 


By Zac Briffa 


The key in Lee Isaac Chung’s Minari lies 
in the scene between Grandma Yi and 
youngest child David Yi at a creek nearby 
their homestead. Grandma is joyous over 
the growth of the Korean weed minari 
she previously sowed the seeds for, and 
explains to David the wonder of minari; 
their ability to grow anywhere. As well as 
recognising the resilience of the Yi family 
in their similarity to minari, this scene 
highlights a crossroads for young David, a 
first generation American, who until now 
had been neglecting his Grandma for not 
fitting his Americanized lens of what a 
grandmother should be. David’s reckoning 
with cultural assimilation is at the forefront 


of Chung’s warm and realised work. 





a 
. re > 
- ail ~~ 


F Perwie Spohr et 
ae Ty oe sane” ‘ FF ms HEH aes —_ 


G 






Minari follows the Yi family, made of 
father Jacob (Steven Yeun), mother Monica 
(Han Yeri), eldest child Anne (Noel Kate 
Cho) and the aforementioned David (Alan 
Kim) and Grandma (Youn Yuh-jung) as 
they move their lives to rural Arkansas 
in the 1980s, with the adults struggling 
to adjust to American life. ‘This telling of 
immigration feels so fresh and intimate that 
it may very well be biographical for director 
Chung, who himself was a first generation 
American raised around farms. This 
intimacy is created through the delicacy 
with which Chung treats his subject. He, 
with great assistance from his Director of 
Photography Lachlan Milne and composer 
Emile Mosseri, exposes us to an auditorium 
of sensory pleasures that evoke a dreamlike 


haziness. Chung creates such an embracing 


atmosphere that narrative lucidity doesn't 


dominate, insteading heeding the way for 
the swelling scores that synergise with 
sweeping landscapes and everlasting skies. 
Light scintillates with such a warmth 
it almost becomes daunting, perfectly 
engulfing the family’s individual fears and 
aspirations taking on the American Dream; 
naivety (the children), haze (the parents) 


and sleepiness (the grandmother). 


This ideology of American Dream is not 
battled with nor embraced, rather looked 
at from a powerfully neutral perspective, 
highlighting the gains and losses that come 
from it. However, it is abundantly clear that 


whatever construct of an American Dream 


the Yi's possess is entirely through their own 
doing. Jacob is hellbent on creating a farm 
to better life for his family, but clashes with 
Monica who fears he has ultimately drifted 
further away from those closest to him 
through this pursuit. It is by tackling both 
the monetary and personal halves of the 
American Dream that we come back to the 
assimilation that David is confronted with, 
as shared not identically but thematically 
with the rest of his family. David and his 
sister have strong American accents, they 
drink Mountain Dew and watch wrestling 
on television. Contrastingly, their parents, 
despite living in America for a number 
of years, barely speak the language. ‘Their 
children converse with them bilingually yet 





there is barely a moment the parents utter 
a word of English to their children. ‘There 
doesnt need to be, as is the case with any 
immigration, but it’s the more nuanced 
developments such as Jacob’s relationship 
with his exuberant Pentecostal neighbour 
(Will Patton) that suggest that much like 
the minari theyre growing, the Yi family 


are making a home for themselves. 


Issue #10 





The Glenunga Dispatch 





A Fier 


26/05/21 


) A er aa 
Hoag 2 


Ii (a LL ii | i 
ol) u 4 |e } | | 


EAT os in 











Over 

















srael 


by Amin Slee 


In May 2021, 


organisation Hamas fired multiple rockets 


Palastinian terrorist 
at the coastal city of Tel-Aviv in the Middle 
Eastern country of Israel. Video footage 
showed rockets flaring up in the sky and 
exploding on random buildings with 
innocent civilians scrambling for safety. 
This attack marked a climactic restart to 
one of the world’s most controversial and 
costly conflicts as the debates between Israel 
and Palestine continue both domestically, 


abroad and on social media. 


Recent attacks in the last few months 
were interpreted as retaliation for the 
deadly government crackdown on political 


dissent, and the brutal takeover of the Al- 


Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem that injured 
dozens of Palestinians and at least 6 
Israeli policemen. The State of Israel has 
gained mass condemnation from both 
foreign governments and the international 
community for its human rights abuses 
against civilians. An abundance of activists 
around the globe and on the internet have 
spread their message of so-called ‘Israeli 
Apartheid’ while comparing modern Israel 


to the Apartheid era in South Africa. 


However, many questions still remain. Will 
this lead to another war? Will this seal the 
fate of Israel? Will this be a new beginning 


for Israel and its citizens? 


Page 21 


Issue #10 


x 


Wi 


\\ 
N 


How can a show that covers 
the Modern Day Mafia, a 
{0s Esque Lemur Heist & a 
Lord of The Rings Fantasy 
Setting, among other things, 
exist? Well, It’s About an 
Experimental Drug Trial, of 
course. 


by Max Lock 





The Glenunga Dispatch 


If that synopsis of the show that this article 
will cover doesn't draw you in, then clearly 
you ll be skipping over it. However, if it did, 
then please allow me to introduce the 2018 
Netflix original show Maniac. This limited 
series, comprising of ten episodes of dras- 
tically varying lengths, stars Emma Stone 
& Jonah Hill among many other actors 
that portray the roles of their characters in 
such a way that conveys every emotional 
beat that the showrunners wish to convey. 
However, the cast is not what truly stands 
out with this show; rather, it represents the 
transition our storytelling industry has be- 
gun to undertake into a majorly film based 
scene, with a larger focus on production 


quality rather than sheer quantity. 


Of course, shows in the past few decades 
have consistently demonstrated an upward 
curve in the amount of time and effort 
placed into their visual and storytelling as- 
pects, Netflix being at the forefront of this 
revolution (although in some cases this may 
not be necessarily the best thing), and I be- 
lieve that Maniac is a prime example of this. 
With this in mind, let’s take a look at the 


show. 


26/05/21 





sIhe general plot of this show is one 
mentioned prior; in a retrofuturistic world, 
dripping with advertising and with a lack 
of human interaction, two average citizens 
Annie Landsberg and Owen Milerim, 
both of whom have experienced some form 
of trauma, the latter having Schizophrenia, 
highly 


experimental drug trial that is meant to 


submit themselves into a 
cure all forms of mental illness by entering 
three stages of personalised experiences. 
These are induced by three pills, A, B & 
C, which each take the form of a different 
stage of the overcoming of grief, with 
C-Confrontation, being the setting for the 
series finale. But by some freak accident, 
the two protagonists mentioned prior’s 
wires have somehow crossed, and from the 
very beginning they have begun to appear 
in one another’s visions. The dreamscape 
hallucinations each character experiences 
are personalised to suit their problems, 
providing the settings for each unexpected 


concept the show manages to include. 


Issue #10 


The Glenunga Dispatch 


26/05/21 





; 


One of the many reasons this show is so 
potent, and so symbolic of the quickly 
transitioning industry, is its subtle yet 
ever-present references and secrets only 
achievable in a medium such as this. From 
the broader themes such as the significance 
of Don Quixote and Bonsai ‘Trees to 
recurring characters from the real world 
that have manifested themselves in the 
visions the characters experience, bringing 
to mind popular films and movies similar 
to this such as The Truman Show and 
Wandavision, both are creations of which I 
would recommend to anyone who enjoyed 


this one. 


This story, written in such a way that it 
can be interpreted in multiple, conveys 
feelings of grief and disbelief in our reality 
in a tangible style that genuinely makes you 
believe that there may be something the 
show is concealing from you. It possesses 
much of the mystery of shows such as 
Wandavision, but rather than having a stark 
contrast from one episode in which you 
have no clue what is going on, and the next 
when all has been revealed, the show allows 


you to slowly pick up the mysteries without 


giving it to you straight up. Thus, when you 


discover something especially secretive, the 
satisfaction is unrivaled, and once again we 
see the power that such a medium can be 


manipulated into possessing. 


All of the elements which I have discussed 
provide valid points for the argument that 
Film & TV have reached a peak unrivalled 
by novels (although this form of storytelling 
most definitely still has its place; as a book 
hoarder I will never deny this), but I have 
not mentioned the one that is most likely 
the most obvious: The atmosphere the 


show creates. 


Of course, there is a certain charm to the 
ability to allow oneself to lose all perception 
of time when entering the rich description 
of a novel; but when another medium 
presents an offer to be enthralled in the 
world created by film and media, then a 
choice can be made. Maniac presents some 
of the best set & costume design boasted by 
Netflix’s budget that I have seen, with the 
wet, decrepit world Annie & Owen inhabit 
being sumptuous in the way that each dirty 


corner, each advertisement, each person's 





outfit oozes with the rich, undeniable 
character of the world they inhabit. This is 
true for any of these possible worlds, with 
the 1920s seance being populated with 
immaculate furs and lint-free blazers while 
the halls of NATO are filled with coats 
and miniskirts and imposing guards. It is 
difficult to describe how real each reality 
created feels, and for this reason I implore 


you to watch the show yourself. 


On that note, I conclude this article by 
once again encouraging you to go check 
out the show (although there is a content 
warning for extreme violence, course 
language, sexual references & and a trigger 
warning for self-harm) as it, mentioned 
prior, beautifully highlights the new age of 
storytelling. If for no other reason, however, 
then watch it for the beautiful set and 
costume design, as that is originally what 


drew me into the show. 


Page 23 


Issue #10 


The Glenunga Dispatch 


26/05/21 








was sitting with my family friends and 
I my sister brought up the “Black Fungus’ 
crisis in India (which is also experiencing 
a terrifying COVID crisis). The Black 
Fungus article I chose to look at oddly 
ended with “: Goat” so I was immediately 
compelled. I was click baited, in reality, 
however I wasn't disappointed. There was 
an entire paragraph that begged people to 
“stop rubbing cow dung and piss on your 
bodies to stop the spread of COVID”. I 
remember it being one of the few things 


that had made me laugh in weeks. 


India is truly suffering right now and you 


can blame the terrible leadership, and 


Page 24 


Ary 
UUW 


by Vidhi Vira 





I’m in no way excusing the garbage that 
is Indian politics, however it’s hard to 
stop the spread of COVID in a country 
with fifty-four times the population of 
Australia and a third of the space. Sure, the 
leadership isn't great but the people aren't 
any better (and I can say this because I am 
Indian).’To put into context, if ten percent 
of Australia decided to be goofballs during 
the COVID mini-crisis that’s around two 
and half million people. If ten percent of 
India decided to do the same that’s around 


one hundred and thirty million people. 


We've all lost people this year but what 


hurts is being unable to say good bye, having 


THREAT LEVEL 


a respectful funeral and seeing everyone 
around you hurt and be stuck. One of my 
family friends lost his grandad and _ his 
grandfather's last words to his father were 
“why aren't you here? Why didn't you come 
at the end? Why did you leave me alone?” 
because he didnt understand or know 
about the travel ban. We're all suffering and 
we cant do anything. We're all helpless. 

So, I hope that everyone can support their 
brown friends this year, Indian, Bangladeshi, 
Sri Lankan, Pakistani. Be there for them 


and be there for each other. 


Issue #10 The Glenunga Dispatch 26/05/21 
ee 


grow. 


the other day i sat in the garden 

thought id do some homework there. 

then i spotted him 

a little weed 

growing not two centimetres away from my big toe 
stretching long like the expectations of my young soul 
yet looking as limp as the cup noodles i can afford 

the weight of a dying world on his little weed shoulders. 
i tried to rip him up, he grew again 

and again 

and again. 

i decided 

maybe the world isn't so bad 

because we can grow back 

the ground heals 

just like our sores scab over and pinken 

the healing just looks a little different; 


like a weed, growing when you try to cut him down. 


-Edmund Arson 





Page 25 


Issue #10 The Glenunga Dispatch 26/05/21 





Hiraeth (Cn. ) 


Looking through the dictionary, I found this word- 
A word that struck me too hard. 

A word that describes my longing 

My longing for a home so peaceful and so sound 


Without all the theatrics of now. 


They had told me to pick a side, 
But that’s something I can rarely ever do. 
I was too naive, I guess, 


To realise they were always going to leave. 


Whether I decided or not. 


They didn’t even glance back, not once. 
But I could hear them well 

The wind, it carries their words 

I look back though. 

I look back at the photos 


Because they never change. 


Even if we did. 


So I stared at the word 
Like it didn’t exist. 
My feelings seemed like a myth. 


A word that described my longing for a home. 


A home woven with the threads of my imagination. 
The fabric soft and breathable. 
Hiraeth is what I feel. 


-Rishvaa 





Issue #10 


The Glenunga Dispatch 


26/05/21 





The Glenunga 
Dispatch 


Editor-in-Chief 
Amir Alikhani 


Lead Designer 
Hayden Chan 


Publisher 
Luke Reichstein 


Copy Editor 
Charlie Stamatogiannis 


Associate Editors 
Isaac Jacobs 
Kira Loh 


Managing Editor 
Isaac Sibley 





Section Editors 


Arts & Culture 
Akshara Radhakrishnan 


Film & Media 
Isabelle Kameron 


Music 
Zee Islam 


Politics 
Arth Tiwari 


science & Technology 
Ray Okamoto 


Sports 
Shawn Mbewe 


Student Life 
Priya Garikipaty 


Contributors 


Alex Brown 

Alfonso Lafosse 

Amin Slee 

Anton lvanov 

Chetan Changalasetty 
Max Lock 

Rishvaa Tyagi 

Vidhi Vira 

Zac Briffa 


Page 27 





Putting an emphasis on student voice and student life.